Gioca a bridge quando e dove vuoi!

10/10

Welll organized, nimble, easy to use. Got me through the 1st 2 yrs of the Pandemic. Love the recent addition of commented deals as well as feedback on my bidding and play. Premium is totally worth it. Also appreciated that when I reached out to the support team about slowed operation and glitches, they were swiftly and helpfully responsive.

8/10

Great

8/10

Great when working

10/10

The site is excellent, with varied content for bridge players of all levels

10/10

Just the best practice

10/10

Great for practice.

6/10

Good on iOS, but Android app still has an annoying bug where the card play corrupts towards the end of the hand, and on Windows/Mac it is a web app which is not as good as a native app would be. The AI Is mostly good but occasionally arbitrary. Funbridge also makes a lot of its games extra cost even for paying subscribers which is another annoyance.

10/10

Good

8/10

Fun but I only use practice mode

10/10

It’s a kind of duplicate bridge and I have always loved playing duplicate. The tournaments are fun, too.

10/10

Good learning tool.

2/10

Easy to use

10/10

I love it

8/10

I don’t use the app. I play on my Mac desktop using the website funbridge.com. I was having problems with the app. I contacted customer service, which explained to me that the app works on IPhones but not on Mac desktops. Customer service provided good service.

2/10

Way too expensive

8/10

I enjoy playing very much. I feel the messages have a very pale back ground and hard to read. It is sometimes difficult to read the point count. The explanation for the bidding is not always easy to understand and the partner often puts me into a higher category than my bidding suggests but in the past when I have complained I have not had any response.

8/10

Generally OK. but : 1. No way to contact you online on in person.. TN? 2. No way to make best contract in a few cases (Reviewed with a life master) 3.Scoring on practice deals is discouraging. I had the best result on a hand recently but only scored 50% since 37 other players had the same result. A more encouraging score would be 75%, the mid-point of the best results.